|
AIDS
Acquired by Drug Consumption and Other Noncontagious Risk Factors
By Peter H.
Duesberg
Pharmacology
& Therapeutics 55: 201-277, 1992
Contents
Abstract
Part
1
1. Virus-AIDS Hypothesis Fails to Predict Epidemiology and Pathology
of AIDS
2. Definition
of AIDS
Part 2
3. Discrepancies
Between AIDS and Infectious Disease
Part 3
4. The Drug-AIDS
Hypothesis
5. Drugs and Other
Noncontagious Risk Factors Resolve all Paradoxes of the
Virus-AIDS Hypothesis
6. Why did AIDS
Science go Wrong?
Part 4
Note Added in
Proof
Acknowledgements
References
Abstract
The hypothesis
that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a new, sexually transmitted
virus that causes AIDS has been entirely unproductive in terms of
public health benefits. Moreover, it fails to predict the epidemiology
of AIDS, the annual AIDS risk and the very heterogeneous AIDS diseases
of infected persons. The correct hypothesis must explain why: (1)
AIDS includes 25 previously known diseases and two clinically and
epidemiologically very different epidemics, one in America and Europe,
the other in Africa; (2) almost all American (90%) and European
(86%) AIDS patients are males over the age of 20, while African
AIDS affects both sexes equally; (3) the annual AIDS risks of infected
babies, intravenous drug users, homosexuals who use aphrodisiacs,
hemophiliacs and Africans vary over 100-fold; (4) many AIDS patients
have diseases that do not depend on immunodeficiency, such as Kaposi's
sarcoma, lymphoma, dementia and wasting; (5) the AIDS diseases of
Americans (97%) and Europeans (87%) are predetermined by prior health
risks, including long-term consumption of illicit recreational drugs,
the antiviral drug AZT and congenital deficiencies like hemophilia,
and those of Africans are Africa-specific. Both negative and positive
evidence shows that AIDS is not infectious: (1) the virus hypothesis
fails all conventional criteria of causation; (2) over 100-fold
different AIDS risks in different risk groups show that HIV is not
sufficient for AIDS; (3) AIDS is only "acquired," if at
all, years after HIV is neutralized by antibodies; (4) AIDS is new
but HIV is a long-established, perinatally transmitted retrovirus;
(5) alternative explanations disprove all assumptions and anecdotal
cases cited in support of the virus hypothesis; (6) all AIDS-defining
diseases occur in matched risk groups, at the same rate, in the
absence of HIV; (7) there is no common, active microbe in all AIDS
patients; (8) AIDS manifests in unpredictable and unrelated diseases;
and (9) it does not spread randomly between the sexes in America
and Europe. Based on numerous data documenting that drugs are necessary
for HIV-positives and sufficient for HIV-negatives to develop AIDS
diseases, it is proposed that all American/European AIDS diseases,
that exceed their normal background, result from recreational and
anti-HIV drugs. African AIDS is proposed to result from protein
malnutrition, poor sanitation and subsequent parasitic infections.
This hypothesis resolves all paradoxes of the virus-AIDS hypothesis.
It is epidemiologically and experimentally testable and provides
a rational basis for AIDS control.
"It's
too late to correct," said the Red Queen. "When you've
once said a thing, that fixes it, and you must take the consequences."
-Lewis Carroll,
Through the Looking Glass
|